← All roles
AI Agent Architect
Senior IC who decides whether a problem needs one agent, three, or none. Cares about contracts between agents, escalation paths, and the moments where probabilistic systems must defer to deterministic ones.
Indicative comp$220K – $320K base (US, staff/principal)
Ranges are indicative US base salary at senior level. Actual offers depend on company stage, equity, and candidate strength.
What this role actually owns
- Decide where agents earn their keep and where deterministic code is the right answer.
- Define interfaces between agents, tools, and human reviewers.
- Set policy on retries, timeouts, escalation, and approval gates.
- Author the technical strategy doc the team builds against.
- Mentor agentic AI engineers on patterns that hold up at scale.
What we screen for
- 8+ years engineering, with at least one staff/principal-equivalent role.
- Has architected a system with 3+ agents in production — can sketch its topology on a whiteboard.
- Articulate about tradeoffs: planner-executor vs. supervisor-worker, monolithic vs. specialized agents.
- Has written an RFC the rest of the team actually used.
- Bonus: background in distributed systems or workflow engines.
Sample job description
A starting point you can paste into your ATS and adjust. The exact wording matters less than the rubric — the bullets above are what we'll calibrate against during search.
AI Agent Architect
Designs the system shape — which agents exist, what they own, how they hand off, and where the human stays in the loop.
You'll own:
- Decide where agents earn their keep and where deterministic code is the right answer.
- Define interfaces between agents, tools, and human reviewers.
- Set policy on retries, timeouts, escalation, and approval gates.
- Author the technical strategy doc the team builds against.
We're looking for:
- 8+ years engineering, with at least one staff/principal-equivalent role.
- Has architected a system with 3+ agents in production — can sketch its topology on a whiteboard.
- Articulate about tradeoffs: planner-executor vs. supervisor-worker, monolithic vs. specialized agents.
- Has written an RFC the rest of the team actually used.
- Bonus: background in distributed systems or workflow engines.